SCOTUS Rules on Trump’s Bid To Overturn E. Jean Carroll Verdict

federal rules of evidence, created unfair prejudice, and conflicted with precedents on similar-fact evidence.

Lawyers described Carroll’s allegations as “implausible” and “unsubstantiated,” insisting the entire matter amounted to a politically timed effort to damage him.

In filings to the high court, Trump’s attorneys wrote: “It is deeply damaging to continue reading …